AVEX GRID was founded in 2025. Our portfolio is intentionally small while we build it. Below is a mix of academic case work that demonstrates technical depth, and the engagement formats we’re actively taking on now. We’ll publish anonymised client work as it commissions.
The founder’s 118-page MSc dissertation modelled three Zimbabwean industrial cases in ETAP. The full document is available on request under NDA. Abstracts below.
Load-flow and short-circuit re-validation against a new 22 MVA transformer following hypothetical mill capacity uplift. ETAP-modelled IEEE 1584 arc-flash incident energy across 14 switchgear locations. Outcome: 6 settings changes, 2 relay replacements, PPE category re-grade.
Class A monitoring per IEC 61000-4-30, harmonic analysis to IEEE 519, root-cause traced to upstream rectifier load on shared 33 kV feeder. Mitigation: passive harmonic filter sized and modelled. THD modelled down from 11.4% to 3.2%.
Steady-state, transient, and reactive-capability simulation. Voltage and frequency ride-through assessed against the 2024 Grid Code. Inverter Q-V curves modelled. Outcome: connection approved on first ZETDC review with two reactive-compensation recommendations.
We publish active engagement formats here rather than client names, until each project commissions and we have written permission to disclose.
Full electrical + thermal scope ahead of NEEP 2025 intensive-user filing. Site visits underway; draft report due Q3 2026. IPMVP M&V plan to follow.
DFI-grade feasibility pack. P50/P90 yield, LCOE, DSCR coverage, technical risk register. Lender meeting Q3 2026.
Stamped IEEE 1584 deliverable with full re-validation against 132 kV ZETDC feeder fault levels. Awaiting drawing access.
Portfolio walkthrough audit with prioritised retrofit list. RFQ stage.
Where a careful engineering hand makes a measurable difference. Single-site or small portfolios.
Below USD 200 k a feasibility study isn’t economic. Above USD 10 m you probably need a Big Four engineering team alongside us.
Power-quality investigations, failure analyses, expert-witness reports. Independent, defensible, written for non-engineers.
Sitting on the client side of an EPC contract. Ideal scope: USD 500 k–5 m projects with a single EPC counterparty.
Most of our best work happens because someone emailed us with a problem they couldn't define. Start there.